The Supreme Court of California recently granted a lesbian woman child support from her former partner. The court's summary reads this way:
...we conclude that a woman who agreed to raise children with her lesbian partner, supported her partner’s artificial insemination using an anonymous donor, and received the resulting twin children into her home and held hem out as her own, is the children’s parent under the Uniform Parentage Act and has an obligation to support them.
Note the emphasis in the decision:
1. The woman agreed to raise children (contractual language)
2. The woman supported artificial insemination of her partner
3. The woman held [the children] out as her own during the duration of their partnership
These are the reasons that the court agreed in favor of the woman left behind in the relationship to care for the children. They are the same reasons that a court would decide that a man who left his opposite-sex partner, after a period of cohabitation, with adopted children, could be responsible for child support. Regardless of gender, the two opposite-sex people entered into a contract and should recognize that the care of their child does not end if their romantic relationship does.
Meanwhile, the governor is planning to veto a bill designed to expand marital rights (and responsibilities, such as child support) to same-sex couples.
Recent Comments