Your email address:

Powered by FeedBlitz

Blog powered by Typepad
AddThis Social Bookmark Button
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Header image by Mieszko Gorski

« What's in a Label? | Main | "Biblically Speaking..." (Christianity Today blogger Olsen adds insult to injury) »

September 22, 2004


Darrell Grizzle

The best book I've read on bisexuality, from a spiritual perspective, is "Blessed Bi Spirit: Bisexual People of Faith," an anthology edited by Debra R. Kolodny. Here's a review I wrote of this book:



For those open to a more new-age perspective, the following book offers the best spiritual account of human sexuality I have ever seen.

These quotes are from The Nature of the Psyche: It’s Human Expression, A Seth book, by Jane Roberts (Amber-Allen Publishing, 1979).



"The human personality is therefore endowed sexually and psychologically with a freedom from strict sexual orientation. This has contributed to the survival of the species by not separating any of it's mental or psychological abilities into two opposite camps." P 188.

“What you think of as lesbian or homosexual activity is quite natural sexual expression, biologically and psychologically.” P59

“I am saying that lesbianism, homosexuality, and heterosexuality are valid expressions of man’s bisexual nature.” P63

“Only a basic bisexuality could give the species the leeway necessary, and prevent stereotyped behavior of a kind that would hamper creativity and social commerce. That basic sexual nature allows you the fulfillment of individual abilities, so that the species does not fall into extinction. Man’s recognition of his bisexual nature is, therefore, a must in his future.” P64

“Lesbianism and homosexuality, as they are currently experienced, also represent exaggerated versions of natural inclinations, even as your
experienced version of heterosexuality is exaggerated.” P59

“Now: Heterosexual love is one important expression of bisexuality, and sexually represents the reproductive abilities. Heterosexuality however rests upon the bisexual basis, and (intently) without man’s bisexual nature, the larger frameworks of the family – the clan, tribe, government, civilization – would be impossible.” P62-63


man, im so confused as to who I am. Don't get me wrong, im a well thought out kind of guy. Let's just say im the guy that always has the bird's eye view of things around him. I always seem to have an answer to whatever problem I'm going through even if it takes me awhile.

But with bisexuality, it something I cannot bloody figure out. This is something I have no answer to. I have a lot of question in mind. Help me out. anyone.


Just really not sure what the point is here. If there were no women available, and no men willing to perform as women, they would resort to the farm animals. All it's proving is than men are horny and in the absence of women will have sex with anything.

You sound like you're trying to argue that deep down, the majority of men are not adverse to homosexuality. If that's the case you must also say that most men are also not adverse to bestiality.

I mean really, what's your point?


What a incredibly ingorant comment - what on Earth does orientation have to do with bestiality?


i think brandon might be suggesting that the male sex drive might be alot bigger than orientation.

bestiality, while disgusting to most of us is, after all, just another orientation. while most of us argue fiercly against those who judge us harshly over things about us that disgust them, we too judge harshly the things about others that disgust us.

life goes on. much love and hope. pj

The comments to this entry are closed.