By the time readers are done reading this particular blog I may lose a few friends, maybe a few church members and a few colleagues will finally have proof that “I have just finally gone over the cliff.”
Those who are promoting the hysteria and paranoia around the building of a mosque near Ground Zero in New York City are in the truest sense of the word “idiots.” I am using this word in the modern sense of its understanding: “describing an extreme folly or stupidity, and its symptoms (foolish or stupid utterance or deed)."
Yes, for a pastor this is VERY strong language, however this controversy is an embarrassment to me as a follower of Christ, an embarrassment as a reasonable educated person and an embarrassment as an American.
First and foremost the term “the Ground Zero Mosque” is misleading and a lie. This proposed building is a full four city blocks from where the World Trade Center stood. In most cities such as Chicago and New York where the geography is grid like, there are about 8 blocks to a mile. 4 blocks would be almost a half a mile from where the World Trade Center stood. This is hardly “ground zero.”
According to Gary Leupp who is a Professor of History, and Adjunct Professor of Comparative Religion, at Tufts University this whole ridiculous controversy got its start from a person by the name of Pamela Geller. Pamela Geller maintains a blog called Atlas Shrugs. She has written a book about Barack Obama in which she alleges his real father was Malcolm X. She leads an apparently tiny wacko group called Stop the Islamization of America.
Soon New York Post columnist Andrea Peyser references Geller's group, falsely describing it as a "human rights group." This brings the movement against the "Ground Zero mosque" out of the blogosphere and into the mainstream press. She sensationalizes the issue, falsely reporting that the center is to open on Sept. 11, 2011.
A "controversy" erupts. The half-term governor of Alaska, Sarah Palin, and then Georgia’s own adulterer former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich weigh in against the mosque. Addressing not Muslims specifically but "Peaceful New Yorkers," Sarah Palin Tweets, "pls refudiate [sic] the Ground Zero mosque plan if you believe catastrophic pain caused @ Twin Towers site is too raw, too real." She adds two days later (after amending "refudiate" to "refute"), "Ground Zero mosque is UNNECESSARY provocation; it stabs hearts. . ." Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich expresses outrage in multiple statements over the next month: "There should be no mosque near Ground Zero in New York so long as there are no churches or synagogues in Saudi Arabia." "It's not about religion," he insists, "and is clearly an aggressive act that is offensive." He says the center will be a symbol of Muslim "triumphalism," and that building the mosque near the site of the 9/11 attacks "would be like putting a Nazi sign next to the Holocaust Museum." He writes, "'Cordoba House' is a deliberately insulting term. It refers to Cordoba, Spain-the capital of Muslim conquerors, who symbolized their victory over the Christian Spaniards by transforming a church there into the world's third-largest mosque complex... every Islamist in the world recognizes Cordoba as a symbol of Islamic conquest." In response to this absurd allegation the center organizers change the name to "Park51." (Gingrich who postures as an historian and scholar might have noted the Visigothic church was purchased by the conquering emir after 718 and that the Arabs during their rule in Spain pursued a policy of far greater religious tolerance than the Christians had before them. They allowed churches and synagogues to operate freely. When the Christians regained power, they expelled all Jews and Muslims, or forced them to convert, and conducted the Spanish Inquisition.)
Come on Mr. Gingrich, you know full well Saudi Arabia an Islamic country. You only go to that country if you are invited. So if you plan on going, you do as you are requested in the home of the host. If you go to the Vatican, you cannot practice another faith in Vatican City, it’s their laws. It is the same as in Saudi Arabia. I know it sounds harsh, but if you choose to go there you are allowed to practice your faith in the privacy of your own living quarters while there, I am not naive enough to say you cannot pray to your own source while here. However, there is just no open propagation. Further it is well known fact that in the United States of America, unlike many countries in the world, “religious freedom” is held sacred and considered a Constitutional right.
Both Palin and Gingrich in their quest for political power and capitalizing on people’s fear conveniently forget some of the biggest groups to come into the United States were those seeking relief from religious persecution. Further, all these folks from the “Right” forget the history of Christians has its moments of incredible terrorism based on fear and arrogance as well. Remember the Salem Witch Trials? From June through September of 1692, nineteen men and women, all having been convicted of witchcraft, were carted to Gallows Hill, a barren slope near Salem Village, for hanging. Another man of over eighty years was pressed to death under heavy stones for refusing to submit to a trial on witchcraft charges. Hundreds of others faced accusations of witchcraft. Dozens languished in jail for months without trials. Then, almost as soon as it had begun, the hysteria that swept through Puritan Massachusetts ended.
Let’s look at one trial transcript to get a feel for what hysteria and paranoia produce: The first accused witch to be brought to trial was Bridget Bishop. Almost sixty years old, owner of a tavern where patrons could drink cider ale and play shuffleboard (even on the Sabbath), critical of her neighbors, and reluctant to pay her bills, Bishop was a likely candidate for an accusation of witchcraft. The fact that Thomas Newton, special prosecutor, selected Bishop for his first prosecution suggests that he believed the stronger case could be made against her than any of the other suspect witches. At Bishop's trial on June 2, 1692, a field hand testified that he saw Bishop's image stealing eggs and then saw her transform herself into a cat. Deliverance Hobbs, by then probably insane, and Mary Warren, both confessed witches, testified that Bishop was one of them. A villager named Samuel Grey told the court that Bishop visited his bed at night and tormented him. A jury of matrons assigned to examine Bishop's body reported that they found an "excrescence of flesh." Several of the afflicted girls testified that Bishop's specter afflicted them. Numerous other villagers described why they thought Bishop was responsible for various bits of bad luck that had befallen them. There was even testimony that while being transported under guard past the Salem meeting house, she looked at the building and caused a part of it to fall to the ground. Bishop's jury returned a verdict of guilty. One of the judges, Nathaniel Saltonstall, aghast at the conduct of the trial, resigned from the court. Chief Justice Stoughton signed Bishop's death warrant, and on June 10, 1692, Bishop was carted to Gallows Hill and hanged.
It was this kind of hysteria and paranoia that was cause for Japanese who where American citizens to be rounded up after Pearl Harbor and placed in camps.
It is this kind of hysteria and paranoia which has police officers in Arizona and Gwinnett County asking brown skin people for their papers.
It is this kind of hysteria and paranoia that does not allow LGBTQI people to serve in the military.
It is this kind of hysteria and paranoia that denies the LGBTQI community marriage.
Let us not forget the American Indians had no idea they were "savages" until the Christians arrived on their land.
Let us not forget Tim McVey and Eric Rudolph were driven by their Christian roots to commit acts of terrorism.
Let us not forget Adolph Hitler considered himself a Catholic until the day he died. In 1941 he told Gerhard Engel, one of his generals: "I am now as before a Catholic and will always remain so." In fact, Hitler was never excommunicated from the Catholic Church, and Mein Kampf was not placed on the Church's Index of Forbidden Books.
Let us not forget the newest whacko pastor at the "Dove World Outreach Center" in Gainesville, Florida -- a "New Testament church, based on the Bible" -- to promote an "International Burn a Quran Day" this September 11. Gee, I wonder what kind of press would be gotten if we held a bible burning day every time some Christian committed an act of violence?
Let us not just gloss over the insanely racist blog of Mark Williams who is quoted by Professor Leupp: "The monument would consist of a Mosque for the worship of the terrorists' monkey-god (repeat: 'the terrorists' monkey-god." if you feel that fits a description of Allah then that is your own deep-seated emotional baggage not mine, talk to the terrorists who use Allah as their excuse and the Muslims who apologize for and rationalize them) and a 'cultural center' to propagandize for the extermination of all things not approved by their cult. It is a project of American Society for Muslim Advancement and the Cordoba Initiative, essentially the same group of apologists (but under 2 different names) for terrorists and the animals who use it as a terrorist ideology. They cloak their evil with new age gibberish that suggests Islam is just misunderstood."
My point here is not to deride the Christian faith, but to simply say we have not held the entire religion accountable because of whackos in the faith. Richard W. Bulliet, Professor of History Middle East Institute Columbia University probably sums it up best when he says, “Jim Jones, David Koresh and Meir Kahane do not typify Christianity and Judaism in the eyes of the civilized West, but those same eyes are prone to see Osama bin Laden and Mullah Muhammad Omar as typifying Islam."
I wonder why that is? Maybe because we as Christians know even less about Islam then we do of Judaism. For instance do most people know Muslims believe that God is one and incomparable and that the purpose of life is to worship God. They regard their religion as the completed and universal version of a primordial, monotheistic faith revealed at many times and places before, including, notably, to the prophets Abraham, Moses and Jesus.
How about this verse found in the Quran: "Those who believe (in the Quran), and those who follow the Jewish (scriptures), and the Christians...and (all) who believe in God and the last day and work righteousness, shall have their reward with their Lord; on them shall be no fear, nor shall they grieve." The Qur'an, 2:62.
9/11 was the idea and mission of one man and a handful of his followers; let us spend our energy, resources and efforts to bring these people to justice. To continue this ridiculous controversy is to forget what made this country a world leader, what despite its many flaws made it the best place in the world to live.
Judaism, Islam and Christianity at their core, are related and deeply connected, we share the same God. In this country “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” I dare say if we continue this path of hysteria and paranoia then these truths we hold as self-evident will be a thing of the past and we will have become that which feared.
idiots? yes, very strong language. paul says some pretty strong words too, about calling someone else a "fool"...in spirit i'm not at all sure of the difference between your use of "idiot" and paul's use of "fool".
too, i think we need to be careful about miminizing the strength of the muslim movement against the west...both in numbers and in passion. this is no tiny, insignificant minority....the views are out in the mainstream if islamic societies all around the world. we see suicide bombings by true believers so often they have become mundane
rather than fall into the same trap the "idiots" have, that is submitting ourselves to the fear and paranoia you speak of in them, rather than rationalize a defense that merely exacerbates the contention....i'd rather just stick to the other argument you made....that of sumitting ourselves to our own principles...those of freedom and tolerance.
Jesus tells us about how easy it is to love those who love us, and how difficult it is to love those who hate us....He also tells us to love them both as He loves us. it's easy to repsect the freedom of those who agree with us, somewhat more difficult to "respect" the freedom of those who disagree. by respect...i think we should be careful with words like "stupid" and "idiots"....just as we need to be careful with words like "perverts" and "abominations.
as one who has known fear, up close and personal, i can't point to one point of my i.q. having been sacrificed to it. but i have gone down roads i'm not always that proud of in reaction to it. i think fear, in most cases, trumps intelligence and objective thinking. guilty, i am.
religious freedom is, as you point out, sacred among many, many of us...the same freedom that i think allows the mosque (community center)to be built....a half a mile from ground zero or right on top of is, is based on the same principle i think grants the right to those who oppose it's building, without being called names.
fighting fear with fear = more fear
fighting fear with light and truth = light and truth.
much love and hope. pj
Posted by: pennyjane | September 19, 2010 at 09:53 AM