In a December 2008 interview with Beliefnet,
even "America's Pastor," Rick Warren, agrees that same-sex couples
should have the same legal rights and responsibilities as heterosexual
couples, but, as we have heard time and time again from opponents of
equality, his primary issue is with the redefinition of the WORD
"marriage."
Warren tells Beliefnet, "I’m opposed to
redefinition of a 5,000 year definition of marriage. I’m opposed to
having a brother and sister being together and calling that marriage.
I’m opposed to an older guy marrying a child and calling that marriage.
I’m opposed to one guy having multiple wives and calling that
marriage."
All this trouble over a word? What are we really
fighting for, here? Maybe what BOTH sides really need is a compromise
that transforms our ideas about civil unions.
In the following 2007 article, KAY WHITLOCK explains the "Beyond Marriage" movement (www.beyondmarriage.org) and why we need a new strategic LGBT vision that does not prioritize marriage over other family forms:
"We must also call for a broader definition of family so that marriage,
for all who choose it, is only one option among many, not the only way
people can access essential government protections and supports. These
supports include unmarried partner access to health insurance,
second-parent adoption, and survivor benefits for Social Security and
pensions."
Surprisingly, it sounds like Rick Warren and others would already be on board.
Recent Comments